Thursday, October 1, 2015
Ein Prosit, ein Prosit ...
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
brevity
DF
Thursday, August 15, 2013
back to what's so comforting
DF
Friday, August 2, 2013
a contrast in dry and sweet Mosel
Bottom: 2009 Bollig-Lehnert Riesling Auslese | QmP Dhroner Hofberger | Mosel
Why not both.
Mosel riesling is my love, my true love, a fire that will never be extinguished. And here, two examples of how diverse riesling can be, yet show that same familial character. First, the trocken, from Maximin Grünhäuser. As described by its U.S. importer Chambers & Chambers Wine Merchants:
DF
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
comfortable in your arms
From the Rheingau to the Mosel, two wines that challenge what you think you know about German riesling. The August Kesseler, a wine that blends sensuality and steeliness, a femme fatale. Ripe tropical notes, mango and papaya, with a most peculiar and unique floral scent, all underlined with a beautiful layer of dry extract. And the Studert-Prüm, always one of my favourite Mosel wines. Racy and pure, this 2011 Graacher Himmelreich is quite ripe for a kabinett. But again, that underlying acidity and minerality making the wine. Happiness.
So we come to the same question as before - can we enjoy a wine on both a sensual as well as intellectual level? In this case, a resounding yes. These wines give so much pleasure, yet offer such a profound vinous experience ... a perfect wine? Or as close to it in the glass as it gets. It's a wine that the most rudimentary of tasters enjoy - it's also a wine that stimulates and excites the most experienced of us. And yes, riesling works like a charm when you're trying to impress your lady friends. When we drink, we drink first for pleasure. But we also drink because wine elevates us, turns us into travelers, philosophers, poets, and horndogs. Whatever works for you.
Thursday, June 6, 2013
wrapped in its warm embrace
When I'm feeling down, when I feel like shit's stacked against me, a glass of a wine that hugs instead of growls at you is the first thing that comes to mind. Actually, no, alcohol isn't top of mind when I'm confronted with problems, but it does help. For my interview with a certain business school in Paris (got my acceptance letter today btw), I was asked to deliver an original presentation. So naturally, I presented my philosophy on wine appreciation; that is, our capacity to enjoy and appreciate wine on both a personal and intellectual level. We experience wine on a very cerebral level, and so of course our mood dictates what and how we drink. And when I'm in a foul temper, I want a wine that embraces and wraps me up in a cocoon of love.
German riesling. 'Nuff said? The Dr. Hermann, showing so open and expressive already for such a tight, structured vintage - all the charm of the Urziger Würzgarten vineyard. The August Kesseler, with ripe, petrol aromas emerging, with a most particular tropical fruit character on the palate (papaya?). Still a baby though, with a long life ahead.
Last day of my week off tomorrow. A lot of housekeeping to be done, and not altogether looking forward to it, but time to get to work. Can't be crying over her forever, right?
DF
Monday, April 29, 2013
waiting for spring showers and sunshine
DF
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
reduction, sponti, and all sorts of fun
Right, so because none of us are chemists and chemistry is boring, let's dumb it down and describe each as it is. Reduction can occur from sulfur use, or be an effect of a reductive winemaking process. The generalized aroma for reduction is rotten eggs. Actual aromas of sulfur come from the addition of large amounts of sulfur during winemaking, and before bottling, as is the standard practice of many German riesling producers who create wines for long aging. The generalized aroma for sulfur is burnt matches. And sponti is the result of off aromas associated with native yeast fermentation, which of course is more exciting but less reliable than selected yeasts. This is where it gets tricky - Peter says that some aromas of sponti are very similar to sulfur, so much so that even wine professionals mistake the two. He says, Unfortunately, the vast majority of people, including most wine professionals, mistake this odor for sulfur, but if you take the time to compare the two, it is easily distinguished. And this is why I need to make friends like Peter.
Calling them flaws isn't truthful, because these off aromas are usually found only in young wines, which simply need bottle age to come around. Really enlightening, and now I have a hankering for riesling. So going back to what I smelled for my first 2 bottles of Bollig-Lehnert. They both smelled gassy, slightly oily, and rubbery. And I wrote them as suffering from reduction problems, caused by sulfur. I'm fairly convinced both were reduced - just maybe not so sure anymore that it was because of the sulfur. But this bottle, the Piesporter Goldtropfchen Auslese ... this one was just fine. Dense and compact, but expressive. Floral and citrusy, that undercurrent of green apple and intense minerality running through. Ripe but linear, beautiful extract and balance on the palate. A dream come true.
DF
Thursday, January 31, 2013
yet again, dry versus sweet
A contrast in styles.
When I was young(er) and still heavily involved in piano, I remember this guy I went up against once at a competition. He was about 3 years older than me, and I hated him the moment I met him. I hated the way he talked, I hated the way he played the piano, and I straight-up hated his face. We had completely different styles of playing. Having stronger hands, his whole thing was to pound the keyboard, banking on impressing the judges with waves of sound leaving little to subtlety or nuance, while I was the polar opposite, favouring a more delicate, structured approach - his sledgehammer to my yanagi-ba-bōchō (there's a new world/old world wine metaphor in there somewhere). We both entered a competition which featured the two of us performing the same piece, and I still grind my teeth when I think about it. Should not have stayed in the room when he was playing (2 spots ahead of me). It was a Chopin, and a big one - runs and pounding octaves, playing right into his style. On the spot, I decided to ramp up my own performance, so it would at least sound similar to his. Fatal error. While he didn't win, he ranked a full 4 places ahead of me. That fucking smirk on his face as we shook hands after ...
So you see, you shouldn't be afraid of contrast, of being true to what you are. There is no singular style of riesling - its beauty, like the beauty of all wine, lies in the variations on its theme. We were having a lot of seafood - fish, clams, mussels, sea cucumber. Differences, if subtle, in flavour and texture. So therefore although we wanted a wine that would drink well with everything on the table, it all had to contrast enough with the overall seafood theme for it to be interesting. The first wine, an Alsatian riesling, was fresh and vibrant, that lovely steely riesling minerality. The Pfalz, a spätlesen, with more substance on the palate, and balanced sweetness providing a great foil to the savouriness of the shellfish. Delicious all around.
It's going to sound all Disney and shit, but things would be so much better if everyone acted true to themselves. These wines aren't meant for everyone - there are still those (terribly, terribly ignorant) people who think sweet wines are all floozy and the antithesis of "serious" wine. But the point is to be brave enough to think outside what is supposedly the accepted wine to drink with a meal, and to infuse some excitement, some mystery into it all. Above all, don't be afraid of being different - to try the contrasting, rather than the complementing thing. And JS, you bowl-cutted twat - I'm up for a rematch, any day, all day.
DF
Monday, November 26, 2012
knowing what she likes
DF
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
reaching for the green bottle
Thursday, October 25, 2012
him and his nephew
Friday, August 24, 2012
on sulfur and reduction in Mosel rieslings
Right. So I was cooking dinner at home a few weeks ago, and in the heat of summer, what's really a more perfect drink than a lean, bracing glass of Mosel wine? I had three wines planned: these two, from the same vintage and vineyard, one a kabinett, the other a spätlese - the third bottle, a 2006 Reichsgraf von Kesselstatt Riesling Kabinett from the Scharzhofberger vineyard. Chilled on ice, then drunk slowly over a few hours.
Dinner was all seafood, the sort of fish soup and clams and tuna sashimi - all that kind of love. You know what . . . we take these wines and try to drink them with cuisines that are completely and utterly unrelated . . . and magically, it all just works. Savoury, briny, sweet, and textural foods, in the Shanghainese style, along with these linear, minerally, electrically-charged wines = bliss. At least that was the plan. And really, a good DF dinner isn't really good until A) I cut/burn/otherwise injure myself or B) something goes off plan.
Well, we went 2 for 2.
De-shelling the clams, the shell broke in half and the edge caught my thumb. Blood, screaming, cursing, all of that. And of course, the wines completely didn't show as I expected: we were drinking them at least 5 years too young. Which leads me to a very important point . . . wine writers and critics (and yes, consultants) are not doing their job if they're only discussing flavour descriptors of the wine and neglecting to write about how the winemaking style and aging patterns actually are the biggest determinant in how people experience the wine. These two bottles were a great example of that kind of oversight.
The following two (professional) tasting notes on the wines were provided in the LCBO Vintages catalogue. The Bollig-Lehnert: Elegant, showing a restrained sense of power. Aromas of savory spice and fennel, with flavors of apple, green peach and Asian pear. Mineral notes linger on the crisp finish. Drink now. Score: 91 (Bruce Sanderson, winespectator.com, Web Only, 2011). The Reinhold Haart: There’s breadth to the exotic flavors of passion fruit, papaya and apricot, with ample flesh, yet it’s all backed by vibrant acidity. Still tight on the finish, with a mouthwatering impression. Best from 2012 through 2026. Score: 92 (Bruce Sanderson, winespectator.com, Dec. 31, 2010).
As both wines are relatively young vintages (2009), both notes were recent as well. While all the descriptive language is fine, it's absolutely egregious that both notes neglect the fact that BOTH wines are horrifically reductive at the moment, and shouldn't be touched for the next 3-5 years at least. This, of course, is no good for the importers or retailers who need quick turnovers on these sub-$20 bottles. It's not unusual to find shocking amounts of sulfur being used in German wines - how else do the rieslings last for decades?! But the consumer needs to know what sulfur is, what it smells like, and how it affects the wine. Ask any average person what odours of reduction in wine are, and well, you get the idea - no one has a fucking clue.
This is doing a disservice to the wines, and to the consumers who make purchase decisions using these tasting notes. Reduction is not a flaw - it simply needs time for the sulfur to dissipate. It's certainly an issue with the producer, with the Bollig-Lehnert being particularly undrinkable. They need to understand how to adjust the sulfur for the wines bottled under screwcap - one doubts if the rubbery, oily fumes will ever really go away. But if the writers and critics - those who claim to be consumer advocates - are not teaching wine drinkers about these things, how else will they find out? They'll buy one of these bottles, open it and pour it down the drain. What?! How come this riesling smells like burning tires and leftover deep fry oil??!!
A shame. I was really looking forward to this pair too. But it does raise an interesting point about the difference in perceived sulfur, in bottles under screwcap versus under cork. The Reinhold Haart, under cork, just showing less reduction, with most of the sulfur blowing off by the 3rd day. The Bollig-Lehnert, under screwcap . . . not a chance.
Next time I'm sticking to Tom Collins all night.
DF
Monday, August 20, 2012
just brimming with excitement
2006 Reichsgraf von Kesselstatt Riesling Kabinett | QmP Scharzhofberger | Mosel
Thursday, August 9, 2012
Auslesen that pierces straight to the heart
I've got a simple philosophy for the wines that I'd like to drink. And that is I want my mind to be blown every time. That's not too much to ask for, is it? We always have this notion that we want wine to taste good and be reliable, but maybe it shouldn't be so. Maybe what we all need in our lives is some surprise, some mystery . . . some romance. We could seriously all do with a little bit more romance, in wines, and elsewhere.
I'd like to think that I've got somewhat of an understanding about German riesling labels. You know, about the different terroirs, the different vineyards, the ripeness levels, the vintages . . . but every once in a while, you come across a bottle like this that's just a bit confusing. Pfalz isn't as heralded for its rieslings as the Mosel or Rheingau, but there's good terroir here. Dr. Bürklin-Wolf is one of the best producers in the region, and the "R" here stands for Reserve - they've been releasing wines from the late 1990's under this designation. An auslese, which gives a sense of what you're going to see in the glass.
This is simply unbridled, heart-thumping romance, class in a glass. Rich and unctuous, with that lovely stream of minerality and acidity. Complex and intellectual, all the while completely seductive and enchanting.
We drank it with dinner over 3 days, but who cares. Those who know me will find this slightly odd, but this is definitely one of those wines that needs to be appreciated on its own. Don't try to be fancy and mess around with greatness. And who says men don't enjoy a bit of romance? Life is stressful and difficult, and ultimately, meaningless, so any chance we have to get away a bit, even if its just to enjoy a glass of good wine, go for a nice walk outside . . . we need to seize it. Find a bit of romance in everything you do.
DF
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
old rieslings and new loves
2001 Schloss Schönborn Riesling | QbA Rheingau
1991 Schloss Schönborn Riesling Spätlese | QmP Hochheimer Domdechaney | Rheingau
If I gush any more about how much I love these wines MY HEAD WILL EXPLODE. No lie. But why bother to keep looking around when you've found the right one?! Occasionally Vintages will bring in some old, mature bottles, so when you see them, don't let the opportunity slip. I've drank all 3 wines in the past: the 1992 Max Ferd Richter here, the 2001 Schloss Schönborn here, and the 1991 here.
It's all almost too much of a good thing. Mature riesling must be in the top 5 of the greatest things the Germans have given the world, along with the Mercedes-Benz 300SL Gullwing, Beethoven, the Steinway Concert Grand Model D, schweinshaxe, and of course, beer. These wines are legendary, and if rumours are true about trends turning to more drier styles of riesling, these bottles will soon become few and far between. It will be a sad day indeed, when these perfectly tensile, linear beauties will be a thing of the past. IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT BEING SWEET PEOPLE, IT'S ALL ABOUT BALANCE!!!!!!
Generalizations always do an injustice, but the minerality in these wines (the clear, obvious, most important element of riesling) falls into two groups. With age, as they reach maturity, the minerality settles down as well into (A) a sort of oily, creamy happiness, that lanolin cream/petrol aroma or (B) an intense slate/wet stone kind of love. Along with developed aromas and flavours, the wines change in texture, with many displaying a stunning elegance and viscosity on the palate. You still get all that honey and ripe citrus and spice . . . just more so. I can keep going on and on, but really, it's like those annoying parents who just had a newborn and can't stop gushing about how brilliant, how special their baby is. Let them/me have their/my moment!!
I was so over the fucking moon to taste all three of these wines together. The 1992 Max Ferd. Richter, which I thought was getting a bit tired last year, just booming. So much energy, the most beautiful maturity, all spicy honey and stone minerality. Lean but perfectly balanced, whispering into a long, completely seductive finish. The pair of Schloss Schönborns were simply brilliant. The 2001, a delicious wine, balanced and still wonderfully drinkable. But the 1991; just on another level. For me, it completely redefines what purity is in a wine. Utterly transparent, that kind of wine that goes straight through you into your soul, if I'm allowed to be so melodramatic. Green apple and honey, rich but great electricity on the palate. Zinging. An absolute dream of a wine.
So working on some things lately, internally. Lots of things to figure out in the next two months. Sort of personal, professional life decisions all coming at me at once. But really, no reason to complain about being busy with things; beats sitting on my ass doing jackshit, right?
DF
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Riesling and dry extract
2010 Thirty Bench Triangle Vineyard Riesling | VQA Beamsville Bench
2008 Vollenweider Riesling Kabinett | QmP Wolfer Goldgrube | Mosel
These wines illuminate the fact that for riesling, at least the great ones, the most important factor that determines its character is dry extract. The low alcohol, the aromatics, the acidity, the minerality . . . all these define riesling, but what truly separates the good from the grand is the dry extract you feel on the palate. That sappy structure that gives a tactile feeling to the acidity, as well as makes the minerality more than just this intangible thing everyone has problem describing.
Few rieslings in the world do dry extract as well as the Germans. We have an example here, with a Mosel, and what I think of as one of the best Niagara rieslings, a single vineyard riesling from Thirty Bench. While it's all correct with the Niagara wine, all lovely, delicate finesse, it just doesn't have that impact on the palate that the Vollenweider has. Why is that? Is it because most riesling producers are more focused on making dry wines? Afraid that consumers only find lean white wines acceptable?
Both were delicious. But the Mosel, just more so.
DF
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
like a thunderbolt from heaven
2008 Vollenweider Riesling Kabinett | QmP Wolfer Goldgrube | Mosel
I'm a simple-to-please kind of guy. All I ever want is to drink wines that don't compromise, that are soulful, and that don't give a shit what other people think. It's something that doesn't have to do with price or region, or even varietal for that matter. Great wines come from a place of humility, we have to remember. Riesling is something I can go on for a long time, and be very boring about; quite simply, it's a treasure of the wine world. And chances are, if you don't like drinking riesling, I don't much care for you as a human being. Two examples here of why this sublime grape instills such fire. The Nahe, a bit lacking in concentration for this vintage, but otherwise textbook. And the Vollenweider, with depth and complexity, even at barely 4 years of age.
Why can't people who write about wine (professionally) take a harder stance on wines that they really like. No, sometimes, it's not about what tastes good to you. That doesn't work if a person doesn't have a palate.So as the professional, it's up to you to educate people, instead of this democratic, equal-opportunity bullshit. We'd all be much better off for it, because timid, p-c, pieces are no fun for anyone.
DF
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
it was waiting for me
Thursday, December 29, 2011
white wine: minerality and focus
White wine is the best. You want to talk about transparency in wine . . . you want to talk about minerality; white wines can present that terroir expression faithfully, without all the fuss that plagues red wines (oak and low acid and all that).











